ETF REPORT ON USAID REDUCTIONS

A summary of this report popped up on my LinkedIn feed this morning. See the summary below.

πŸ“˜ Impact of USAID Withdrawal on Global Education and Skills Development

This new report by Elena Walls in collaboration with the European Training Foundation provides the first comprehensive analysis of the global consequences following the withdrawal of USAID from international education funding in early 2025.

It details the size, scope and immediate impact of this decision β€” drawing on public data from ForeignAssistance .gov, national budget records, and official programme documentation.

Key findings:

βœ‚οΈ 396 education programmes were cancelled across 58 countries, including early childhood education, foundational literacy, vocational training and access to higher education.

πŸ’° More than $1.02 billion in annual funding was withdrawn. In 2023, USAID managed over 75% of all US international education investments.

πŸ“ Top five recipient countries (2022–2024):
β€’ Jordan πŸ‡―πŸ‡΄ – $402.5 million
β€’ Egypt πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¬ – $191.2 million
β€’ Lebanon πŸ‡±πŸ‡§ – $161.6 million
β€’ Afghanistan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡« – $138.9 million
β€’ Malawi πŸ‡²πŸ‡Ό – $81.7 million

These countries are among the most affected by the loss of USAID support. In 2024, USAID funding accounted for 12.9% of Afghanistan’s entire education budget and 8.1% of Jordan’s.

πŸ“š Breakdown by sector (2023):
β€’ 75% of USAID’s education portfolio supported primary education
β€’ 17% supported higher education
β€’ 8% supported technical and vocational education and training

Between 2011 and 2021, USAID foundational skills programmes reached 246 million students in 53 countries.

πŸ§‘β€πŸ« Main programme partners included:
β€’ NGOs – 28.9%
β€’ Universities and colleges – 21.2%
β€’ Multilateral platforms (GPE, ECW) – 15.1%
β€’ Government institutions – 11.1%

πŸ“‰ Examples of cancelled programmes:
β€’ Lebanon πŸ‡±πŸ‡§ – QITABI 2 & 3 national reading programme – $99.5m
β€’ Uganda πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¬ – Integrated Child and Youth Development – $118.9m
β€’ Malawi πŸ‡²πŸ‡Ό – NextGen Early Grade Reading – $74.9m
β€’ Kenya πŸ‡°πŸ‡ͺ – Primary Literacy Programme – $79.5m
β€’ Afghanistan πŸ‡¦πŸ‡« – Access to Quality Basic Education (AQBE) – $49m
β€’ Zambia πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡² – Let’s Read – $49m

USAID was the largest bilateral donor to Education Cannot Wait (ECW) and one of the biggest contributors to the Global Partnership for Education. It also supported collaborative efforts such as BE2, the Coalition for Foundational Learning, and a number of research, innovation and data-sharing initiatives across multiple regions.

πŸ“Š The report includes regional breakdowns, funding patterns, and detailed analysis of the systems-level impact β€” particularly for low- and middle-income countries reliant on long-term bilateral support.

It concludes with recommendations for global coordination, including increased EU leadership through Team Europe Initiatives and the Global Gateway.

A must read for anyone working in global education.

USAID OBITUARY

Well, sorry to say, but CNN was correct yesterday in its reporting of the demise of USAID as an entity. I defer to my friends at ICTworks who posted the below notice. You can read the full story here:

An Obituary for USAID: an Icon of Global Development – ICTworks

We hope that eventually it will re-emerge under the US State Department in some form. Time will tell.

Keep well and doing good.

Taking a Critical Look at USAID Approach to Development Funding

PBS News Hour : January 7, 2025 – PBS News Hour full episode | Cascade PBS

For those interested in how the USAID funds international development, a current segment in PBS News Hour will be of interest. I rarely watch PBS Newshour but last evening I did have time and found this informative story about USAID. Apparently, the agency does most of its work through big US companies that seem to focus more on inputs and activities rather than results. One section of the story gave examples of an alternative approach where funds were provided directly to local partners who provided much better results.

Sidebar: The assignment I had some years ago with one of these big US firms did indeed engage with local entities including a local training center, private sector entities, and schools. There were positive results. So not all USAID projects are alike.

In Canada, I think we do better with implementing agencies like CUSO providing volunteers to strengthen local NGOs, many of which are supporting projects on gender equality and improved livelihoods for women. (Don’t forget to keep monitoring CUSO International’s website for current employment opportunities)

Similarly, CATALYSTE+ (formerly CESO), is providing senior professionals the opportunity to give back by offering their advice on short missions to host organizations that actually help develop the assignment’s terms of reference. I just submitted an application to CATALYSTE+ and will describe that process and its result in an upcoming post.

Meanwhile, I look forward to seeing the next two episodes of the 3 part USAID story on the PBS Newshour…